Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 458-464, February 2012

The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates

Presented at the 2011 Vascular Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill, June 16-18, 2011.

  • Michael Harlander-Locke

      Affiliations

    • University of San Diego, San Diego, Calif
  • ,
  • Peter F. Lawrence, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery and Gonda Vascular Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Peter F. Lawrence, University of California, Los Angeles, Gonda (Goldschmeid) Vascular Center, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Ste. 526, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6908
  • ,
  • Ali Alktaifi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery and Gonda Vascular Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
  • ,
  • Juan Carlos Jimenez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery and Gonda Vascular Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
  • ,
  • David Rigberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery and Gonda Vascular Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
  • ,
  • Brian DeRubertis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery and Gonda Vascular Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif

Received 16 July 2011; accepted 28 August 2011. published online 01 December 2011.

Objective

We assessed the impact of endovenous ablation of incompetent superficial (great saphenous [GSV] and small saphenous [SSV]) and perforator (posterior tibial [PTPV]) veins on the healing rate of venous ulcers in patients who had failed conventional compression therapy.

Methods

Patients with CEAP 6 ulcers were treated with weekly compression in a dedicated wound care center. Ulcer size and depth were tracked prospectively. Those ulcers that showed no measurable improvement after >5 weeks of compression therapy underwent ablation of at least one incompetent vein.

Results

We performed 140 consecutive endovenous ablation procedures (74 superficial and 66 perforator) on 110 venous ulcers in 88 limbs. Ulcers had been present for 71 ± 6 months with an initial ulcer area of 23 ± 6 cm2. Following successful ablation, the healing rate for healed ulcers improved from + 1.0 ± .1 cm2/month to −4.4 ± .1 cm2/month (P > .05). Ulcer healing rate for healed ulcers, based on the last vein ablated, was GSV = 6.4 cm2/month, SSV = 4.8 cm2/month, and PTPV = 2.9 cm2/month. After a minimum observation period of 6 months (mean follow up, 12 ± 1.25 months), 76.3% of patients healed in 142 ± 14 days. Twelve patients with 26 ulcers did not heal: two patients died from unrelated illnesses, six patients are still actively healing, and four patients have been lost to follow up. Of the healed ulcers, four patients with six ulcers (7.1%) recurred; two have rehealed.

Conclusion

There is measurable and significant reduction in ulcer size and ultimate healing following ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins in patients who have failed conventional compression therapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(11)02085-4

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.054

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 458-464, February 2012