Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 406-412, February 2012

Efficacy of combined renal and mesenteric revascularization

Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society, Chicago, Ill, September 10-12, 2009.

  • Nanette R. Reed, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nanette R. Reed, MD, Mayo Clinic, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 200 2nd St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
  • ,
  • Manju Kalra, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Thomas C. Bower, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Gustavo S. Oderich, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Michael McKusick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Audra A. Duncan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Cathy D. Schleck, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Peter Gloviczki, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Received 28 February 2011; accepted 27 August 2011. published online 21 November 2011.

Objective

Small numbers of patients have advanced renal and mesenteric vascular disease requiring treatment. Open surgical treatment has been considered high risk, and the advent of endovascular intervention has affected management. This study evaluated the safety and long-term efficacy of concomitant mesenteric and renal revascularization with open techniques.

Methods

Data from 90 consecutive patients who underwent mesenteric and renal revascularization during a 30-year period were analyzed. Early and late outcomes were evaluated over two intervals: 48 in period A (1978 to 1995), concomitant open renal and mesenteric revascularization (COR; n = 46) and sequential open renal and mesenteric revascularization (SOR; n = 2); 42 in period B (1996 to 2009), 22 COR, 4 SOR, 13 sequential hybrid open/endovascular repairs (SOER), and 3 sequential endovascular repairs (SER).

Results

There were 26 men and 64 women (median age, 67 years). Renal insufficiency was present in 24% and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 53%. Open surgical reconstruction was performed in 126 renal and 149 mesenteric arteries, with angioplasty/stenting in 15 and 8, respectively; 58 patients had concomitant aortic reconstruction (AR), and 9 had prior AR (8 in period A, 1 in period B). Hospital mortality was 8.8% overall; seven (14.5%) in period A and one (2.3%) in period B. Causes of early death were hemorrhage in three and multisystem organ failure in five. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 6 days-26.5 years), 11 patients progressed to hemodialysis (7 COR, 4 SOER), and 6 had recurrent mesenteric ischemia (4 COR, 1 SOER, 1 SER). Eight patients in period A and seven in period B required further procedures (9 renal, 9 mesenteric; 11 COR, 2 SOER, 1 SOR, 1 SER). Univariate analysis of COR patients showed CAD (P = .017) and prior AR (P = .035), but not concomitant AR (P = .366), predicted early death. Five-year survival for COR patients was 65% overall, but 74% in patients who survived the operation, with no difference between time periods (P = .55).

Conclusions

Concomitant open mesenteric and renal revascularization is associated with low early mortality and good long-term durability in appropriately selected patients. It remains a viable procedure, especially in patients requiring concomitant aortic reconstruction. High-risk patients with CAD or prior aortic surgery should be considered for endovascular treatment, when anatomically feasible.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(11)02054-4

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.047

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 406-412, February 2012