Journal Home
Search for

Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 845-850 (November 2009)


View previous. 6 of 34 View next.

Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures revisited: A multicenter study on 509 cases

Kazuya Tamai, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Noriyuki Ishige, MDb, Shigehito Kuroda, MDb, Wataru Ohno, MDa, Hiromoto Itoh, MDc, Hiroshi Hashiguchi, MDc, Norishige Iizawa, MDc, Motohiko Mikasa, MDb

published online 18 March 2009.

Background

The 4-segment classification of Neer (1970) was revised in 2002 with the inclusion of valgus-impacted fractures. However, the range of possible fracture types covered by this classification is not clear. With the aim to clarify actual fracture patterns of the proximal humerus, a retrospective, multicenter study was conducted.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 509 cases for which anteroposterior and trans-scapular lateral views had been taken at the time of injury. Initially, three examiners from three facilities, independently read the radiographs of each case. In the second and third phases, for more difficult cases, consensus opinions were reached.

Results

We found that 501 (98%) of the 509 fractures had an appropriate category in the revised Neer classification. There were 185 cases (36%) of one-part fractures, followed by 156 cases (31%) of 2-part surgical neck fracture, 60 cases (12%) of 2-part greater tuberosity fracture (dislocation included), 45 cases (8.8%) of 3-part fracture involving the greater tuberosity and the surgical neck (dislocation included), 31 cases (6.1%) of 4-part fracture (dislocation included), and 17 cases (3.3%) of valgus-impacted fracture.Eight fractures (1.6%) could not be classified with the revised Neer classification. They were “3-part” fractures in terms of the number of displaced segments but had a complete anatomic neck fracture.

Conclusion

We conclude that it would be appropriate to use the revised Neer classification in clinical practice. We would emphasize that, when there are 3 displaced segments, close attention should be paid to the fracture line on the anatomic neck.

Level of evidence

Level 4; Diagnostic study, case series.

a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan

b Matsudo Orthopaedic Hospital, Matsudo, Japan

c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Kazuya Tamai, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi 321-0293 Japan.

PII: S1058-2746(09)00083-4

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.018


View previous. 6 of 34 View next.