<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/?rss=yes"><title>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</title><description>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics RSS feed: Current Issue.    
 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT)  is dedicated to the advancement of chiropractic health care. 
It provides the latest information on current developments in therapeutics, as well as reviews of clinically oriented research and practical 
information for use in clinical settings. The Journal's editorial board includes some of the world's leading clinical low-back and spine 
researchers from medicine, osteopathy, chiropractic, and post-secondary education.  JMPT , the premier biomedical publication 
in the chiropractic profession, publishes peer-reviewed original articles, case reports, journal abstracts, commentary, and new media 
reviews. Readers include chiropractors, osteopaths, physical therapists, physiatrists, radiologists, and sports medicine specialists.  
 
 JMPT  is the  only  chiropractic journal included in Index Medicus. It is also indexed/abstracted in Current Contents/Clinical 
Medicine and Index to Chiropractic Literature. 
 
Special discount of $99 offered to COCA members.   </description><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0161-4754</prism:issn><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>May 2012</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000802/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000760/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000759/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000577/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000310/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000589/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000668/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200070X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000644/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000632/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000747/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200067X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000553/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000541/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000826/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200084X/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000802/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Editorial Board</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000802/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Editorial Board</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0161-4754(12)00080-2</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>IFC</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>IFC</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000760/abstract?rss=yes"><title>JMPT Highlights</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000760/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>JMPT Highlights</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.05.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000759/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Lumbar Lordosis Rehabilitation for Pain and Lumbar Segmental Motion in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000759/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of lumbar extension traction with stretching and infrared radiation compared with stretching and infrared radiation alone on the lumbar curve, pain, and intervertebral movements of patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP).Methods: This randomized clinical study with 3-month follow-up was completed at the Cairo University research laboratory. Eighty patients (age ranged from 40 to 50 years) with CMLBP and a hypolordotic lumbar spine were randomly assigned to traction or a comparison group. The comparison group (n = 40) received stretching exercises and infrared radiation, whereas the traction group (n = 40) received lumbar extension traction in addition to stretching exercises and infrared radiation. The absolute rotatory angle, intervertebral movements, and visual analog scale were measured for all patients at 3 intervals.Results: The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups at 2 follow-up time points compared with the baseline values for the translational and sagittal rotational movements of L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, and L2-L3(posttreatment) and absolute rotatory angle (P &lt; .01). There were no statistically significant changes in pain (P = .1 and .3) and L1-L2 (P = .072 and .076) or L2-L3 (at follow-up; P = .3), and there was no significant difference between all the previous variables adjusted to the groups' baseline outcome interaction (P &gt; .01).Conclusion: Lumbar extension traction with stretching exercises and infrared radiation was superior to stretching exercises and infrared radiation alone for improving the sagittal lumbar curve, pain, and intervertebral movement in CMLBP.</description><dc:title>Lumbar Lordosis Rehabilitation for Pain and Lumbar Segmental Motion in Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial</dc:title><dc:creator>Aliaa A. Diab, Ibrahim M. Moustafa</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.021</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000577/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Randomized Clinical Trial of Chiropractic Treatment and Self-Management in Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Chest Pain: 1-Year Follow-Up</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000577/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: We have previously reported short-term follow-up from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing 2 treatments for acute musculoskeletal chest pain: (1) chiropractic treatment and (2) self-management. Results indicated a positive effect in favor of the chiropractic treatment after 4 and 12 weeks. The current article investigates the hypothesis that the advantage observed at 4 and 12 weeks would be sustained after 1 year. In addition, we describe self-reported consequences of acute musculoskeletal chest pain at 1-year follow-up.Methods: In a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial undertaken at an emergency cardiology department and 4 outpatient chiropractic clinics, 115 consecutive patients with acute chest pain of musculoskeletal origin were included. After the baseline evaluation, patients were randomized to 4 weeks of either chiropractic treatment or self-management, with posttreatment questionnaire follow-up 52 weeks later. The primary outcome measures were change in pain intensity (11-point box numerical rating scale) and self-perceived change in pain (7-point ordinal scale).Results: Both groups experienced decreases in pain, positive global, self-perceived treatment effect, and increases in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups at the 1-year follow-up, and we could not deduce a common trend in favor of either intervention.Conclusions: At the 1-year follow-up, we found no difference between groups in terms of pain intensity and self-perceived change in chest pain in the first randomized clinical trial assessing chiropractic treatment vs minimal intervention for patients with acute musculoskeletal chest pain. Further research into health care utilization and use of prescriptive medication is warranted.</description><dc:title>A Randomized Clinical Trial of Chiropractic Treatment and Self-Management in Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Chest Pain: 1-Year Follow-Up</dc:title><dc:creator>Mette J. Stochkendahl, Henrik W. Christensen, Werner Vach, Poul F. Høilund-Carlsen, Torben Haghfelt, Jan Hartvigsen</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000310/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Prevalence of Hip Osteoarthritis in Chiropractic Practice in Denmark: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000310/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of clinical and radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and first-time diagnosis of hip OA in consecutive patients presenting to chiropractic practices in Denmark and to report the components of the initial treatment rendered by the chiropractic practitioner.Methods: A total of 2000 patient records and 1000 radiographs were reviewed retrospectively in 20 chiropractic clinics throughout Denmark. Information obtained included patients' primary complaint, physical examination and radiographic findings of hip OA, and treatment. Subsequently, the 20 clinics participated in a prospective survey where they collected equivalent information over a 2-week period.Results: Retrospective review of records revealed that 1.4% of patients in Danish chiropractic practice had signs of clinical hip OA. Of these, 59% demonstrated radiographic signs of hip OA. Prospective data collection revealed that 3.4% of new patients had signs of clinical hip OA. Fifty-four percent of these demonstrated radiographic signs of hip OA, and of these 70% were diagnosed as having OA of the hip for the first time. Initial treatment involved manual treatment and advice on over-the-counter pain medication and/or supplements. Of all 1000 retrospectively reviewed radiographs in patients 40 years or older, 19.2% demonstrated radiographic signs of hip OA.Conclusion: Osteoarthritis of the hip is diagnosed and managed in primary care chiropractic practice in Denmark; however, it is likely underdiagnosed. In those newly presenting to chiropractic practitioners, first-time diagnosis with clinical and radiographic signs of hip OA appears to be common.</description><dc:title>Prevalence of Hip Osteoarthritis in Chiropractic Practice in Denmark: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study</dc:title><dc:creator>Erik Poulsen, Henrik W. Christensen, Søren Overgaard, Jan Hartvigsen</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000589/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Prevalence of Low Back and Pelvic Pain During Pregnancy in a Norwegian Population</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000589/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cumulative prevalence of low back pain (LBP), pelvic pain (PP), and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy, including features possibly associated with development of pregnancy-related PP, in an unselected population of women.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in which all women giving birth at Stavanger University hospital in a 4-month period were asked to participate and to fill in a questionnaire on demographic features, pain, disability, and Oswestry Disability Index. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy of at least 36 weeks and competence in the Norwegian language.Results: Nearly 50% of the women experienced moderate and severe PP during pregnancy. Approximately 50% of them had PP syndrome, whereas the other half experienced lumbopelvic pain. Ten percent of the women experienced moderate and severe LBP alone. These pain syndromes increased sick leave and impaired general level of function during pregnancy. Approximately 50% of women with PP had pain in the area of the symphysis. The analysis of risk factors did not present a unidirectional and clear picture.Conclusions: Pelvic pain in pregnant women is a health care challenge in which moderate and severe pain develops rather early and has important implications for society. The observed associations between possible causative factors and moderate and severe LBP and PP in this study may, together with results from other studies, bring some valuable insights into their multifactorial influences and provide background information for future studies.</description><dc:title>Prevalence of Low Back and Pelvic Pain During Pregnancy in a Norwegian Population</dc:title><dc:creator>Stefan Malmqvist, Inger Kjaermann, Knut Andersen, Inger Økland, Kolbjørn Brønnick, Jan Petter Larsen</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000668/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effects of Muscular Stretching and Segmental Stabilization on Functional Disability and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000668/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 2 exercise programs, segmental stabilization exercises (SSEs) and stretching of trunk and hamstrings muscles, on functional disability, pain, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain.Methods: A total of 30 participants were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups as a function of intervention. In the segmental stabilization group (SS), exercises focused on the TrA and lumbar multifidus muscles, whereas in the stretching group (ST), exercises focused on stretching the erector spinae, hamstrings, and triceps surae. Severity of pain (visual analog scale and McGill pain questionnaire) and functional disability (Oswestry disability questionnaire) and TrA muscle activation capacity (Pressure Biofeedback Unit, or PBU) were compared as a function of intervention. Interventions lasted 6 weeks, and sessions happened twice a week (30 minutes each). Analysis of variance was used for intergroup and intragroup comparisons.Results: As compared with baseline, both treatments were effective in relieving pain and improving disability (P &lt; .001). Those in the SS group had significantly higher gains for all variables. The stretching group did not effectively activate the TrA (P = .94).Conclusion: Both techniques improved pain and reduced disability. In this study, SS was superior to muscular stretching for the measured variables associated with chronic low back pain.</description><dc:title>Effects of Muscular Stretching and Segmental Stabilization on Functional Disability and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</dc:title><dc:creator>Fábio Renovato França, Thomaz Nogueira Burke, Renê Rogieri Caffaro, Luiz Armando Ramos, Amélia Pasqual Marques</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>285</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200070X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Investigation of the Effects of a Centrally Applied Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Mobilization on Lower Limb Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Asymptomatic Subjects</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200070X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a manual mobilization technique on indirect measures of sympathetic nervous system activity.Methods: Forty-five healthy volunteers participated in this randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group 3-arm design (experimental, sham [placebo], and control group), comprising 15 subjects each. For the experimental group, lumbar mobilization involving an active movement, the Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG), was applied on L4 spinous process by an experienced manual therapist. Sustained natural apophyseal glides were performed in sitting with active flexion (6 times × 3 sets). The sham technique simulated the SNAG without applying any force. In the control group, participants were placed in a static sitting position throughout the experiment. Measures of skin conductance in the lower limbs (L4 dermatome) were recorded to reflect sympathetic nervous system activity in the preintervention, periintervention, and postintervention periods. Differences in percentage change of skin conductance were analyzed with analysis of variance and post hoc tests.Results: Lumbar SNAG produced sympathoexcitation compared with the control group in the intervention period (P = .04). No significant difference was found between SNAG and sham groups, and no statistically significant difference was found between groups in the final rest period.Conclusion: The results of this study showed that, in asymptomatic participants, both lumbar SNAG and sham techniques performed on L4/5 intervertebral joint with active flexion induced a sympathoexcitatory response in lower limbs compared with the control group.</description><dc:title>Investigation of the Effects of a Centrally Applied Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Mobilization on Lower Limb Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Asymptomatic Subjects</dc:title><dc:creator>Maria Moutzouri, Perry Joanna, Billis Eudokia</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.016</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>286</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>294</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000644/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Treatment on Superoxide Dismutase and Glutathione Peroxidase Activities in Erythrocytes From Men With Neck Pain</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000644/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: This study investigates the analgesic effect of high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation and antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in erythrocytes of men with neck pain.Methods: Twenty-two men with neck pain of mechanical origin who were aged 20 to 50 years, were nonsmokers, had a sedentary lifestyle, had no comorbidities, and were not in adjuvant therapy underwent 6 sessions of HVLA chiropractic manipulation 3 times a week for 2 weeks. Patients were treated by the same chiropractor and under the same conditions. Blood samples were collected before the beginning of the treatment and at the end of the third and last session. Erythrocytes were separated from blood and then processed to determine SOD and GPx activities. The quadruple visual scale and the Neck Disability Index were used to demonstrate the analgesic effect of treatment. The results were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni posttest. Differences were considered significant when P was less than .05.Results: Despite the tendency to reduction in SOD and increase in GPx activities, there was no significant change after the treatment.Conclusion: High-velocity, low-amplitude treatment for 6 sessions in men with neck pain did not affect systemic SOD and GPx activities. Despite the absence of significant changes, this study is important because it is the first to investigate the activities of SOD and GPx in patients with neck pain treated with HVLA spinal manipulation.</description><dc:title>Effect of High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Treatment on Superoxide Dismutase and Glutathione Peroxidase Activities in Erythrocytes From Men With Neck Pain</dc:title><dc:creator>Carolina Kolberg, Andréa Horst, Maira S. Moraes, Angela Kolberg, Adriane Belló-Klein, Wania A. Partata</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>295</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>300</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000632/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Immediate Effects of Ischemic Compression on Neck Function in Patients With Cervicogenic Cephalic Syndrome</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000632/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: Cervicogenic cephalic syndrome (CCS), a group of diseases, consists of cervicogenic headache and dizziness. These symptoms may cause loss of physical function compared with other headache and dizziness disorders. The purpose of this case-control study was to assess the clinical effects of ischemic compression (IC) in patients with CCS.Methods: Twenty-seven subjects with chronic neck pain (persisting for &gt;3 months) and 26 healthy volunteers were examined. Subjects with organic lesion of the ear, nose, throat, eye, or central nervous system were excluded. The CCS group received IC over the maximal tender points of the origin of the posterior nuchal muscle. Sensory organization test (SOT) scores, cervical range of motion (ROM), and isometric strength of neck were measured before IC and after IC.Results: The ROM of the cervical spine increased in all directions after IC (P &lt; .0083) in the CCS group, and isometric strength in the CCS group rose in all directions after IC (P = .000). There was a significant difference in ankle strategy score under the sway-referenced vision and fixed support condition (P = .003) between the control group and CCS before IC. The ankle strategy score of the CCS group improved substantially after IC under eyes closed and sway-referenced support conditions (P = .003). The visual and vestibular ratios in the CCS group also increased after IC (P = .006 and P = .002, respectively).Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that ROM of the cervical spine and isometric strength increased in all directions, and the SOT scores showed increased postural stability under conditions with swayed reference support after IC in the CCS group. The ratios for vestibular and visual function also increased after IC in the CCS group.</description><dc:title>Immediate Effects of Ischemic Compression on Neck Function in Patients With Cervicogenic Cephalic Syndrome</dc:title><dc:creator>Yin-Chou Lin, Cheng-Hsiu Lai, Wei-Han Chang, Li-Wen Tu, Jung-Charng Lin, Shih-Wei Chou</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>301</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>307</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000747/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Influence of Different Upper Cervical Positions on Electromyography Activity of the Masticatory Muscles</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000747/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the activity of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in relation to different positions of the upper cervical spine during maximal voluntary isometric clenching by surface electromyography (EMG).Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a repeated-measures design performed using 25 asymptomatic subjects (13 female and 12 male; mean age, 31 years; SD, 8.51). The EMG activity of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles was recorded bilaterally during maximal clenching at neutral position and during extension, flexion, ipsilateral lateral flexion, contralateral lateral flexion, and ipsilateral and contralateral rotations in maximal flexion. In addition, the upper cervical range of motion and mandibular excursions were assessed.The EMG activity data were analyzed using a 3-way analysis of variance in which the factors considered were upper cervical position, sex (male and female), and side (right and left), and the hypothesis of importance was the interaction side x position.Results: The 3-way analysis of variance detected statistically significant differences between the several upper cervical positions (F = 13.724; P &lt; .001) but found no significant differences for sex (F = 0.202; P = .658) or side (F = 0.86; P = .53) regarding EMG activity of the masseter muscle. Significant differences were likewise observed for interaction side x position for the masseter muscle (F = 12.726; P &lt; .001). The analysis of the EMG activity of anterior temporalis muscle did not produce statistically significant differences (P &gt; .05).Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that the upper cervical movements influence the surface EMG activity of the masseter muscle. These findings support a model in which there are interaction between the craniocervical and the craniomandibular system.</description><dc:title>Influence of Different Upper Cervical Positions on Electromyography Activity of the Masticatory Muscles</dc:title><dc:creator>Nikolaus Ballenberger, Harry von Piekartz, Alba Paris-Alemany, Roy La Touche, Santiago Angulo-Diaz-Parreño</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.020</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>308</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200067X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Anterioposterior Spinal Curvatures and Magnitude of Asymmetry in the Trunk in Musicians Playing the Violin Compared With Nonmusicians</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200067X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: Playing an instrument often requires a certain posture and asymmetric position that may affect the anteroposterior spinal curvatures and may lead to postural asymmetry. The aim of the study was to evaluate the spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane and the magnitude of asymmetries in the trunk in the frontal plane in a group of music students in comparison with a control group.Methods: The group of 67 students aged 20 to 26 years was made up of 2 subgroups: the musicians (violin playing students of the Academy of Music in Wroclaw) and the control group (physical therapy students who played no instruments). The examination included an interview, measuring of somatic characteristics, and evaluation of body posture by means of the photogrammetric method.Results: The spinal curvatures of the instrumentalists in the sagittal plane differ from the control group mainly in terms of length and depth parameters. Compared with the control group, the musicians were characterized by statistically more significantly longer and deeper thoracic kyphosis (P &lt; .01) and more shallow lumbar lordosis (P &lt; .05), a greater angle of thoracic kyphosis (P &lt; .005), and a smaller inclination angle of the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral section of the spine (P &lt; .01).Conclusion: In the group of musicians, the asymmetries in the area of shoulders and waist triangles as well as the distance of the spinous processes from the C7 to S1 line were more frequent.</description><dc:title>Anterioposterior Spinal Curvatures and Magnitude of Asymmetry in the Trunk in Musicians Playing the Violin Compared With Nonmusicians</dc:title><dc:creator>Katarzyna Barczyk-Pawelec, Tomasz Sipko, Ewa Demczuk-Włodarczyk, Agata Boczar</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000553/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effects of Foot Orthotics on Running Economy: Methodological Considerations</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000553/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of the study was to collect preliminary data to address methodological considerations that may impact subject-specific reactions to foot orthotics during running.Methods: Six endurance-trained recreational runners recruited from a chiropractic college campus wore their preferred running shoes and then inserted either their custom-made orthotics during 1 testing session or their shoe-fitted insoles during the other testing session. Comfort perception was measured for each footwear condition. Measurements of oxygen consumption (Vo2) at several moderate exercise intensities, to mimic recreational running, generated an individual's economy-of-running line. Predicted running velocity at Vo2max (vVo2max) was calculated as an index of endurance performance. Lower extremity muscle activity was recorded. Descriptive statistics, a repeated-measures analysis of variance model, and a paired t test were used to document any systematic changes in running economy, lower extremity muscle activities, and vVo2max within and across subjects as a function of footwear conditions.Results: Decreases in Vo2 at several moderate exercise intensities (F(1,5)footwear = 10.37, P = .023) and increases in vVo2max (t5 = 4.20, P = .008) occurred in all 6 subjects while wearing their orthotic intervention vs their shoe-fitted insoles. There were no consistent changes in lower extremity muscle activity.Conclusions: Methodological decisions to use a sustained incremental exercise protocol at several moderate exercise intensities and to measure comfort perception of a custom-molded foot orthosis were effective at documenting systematic improvements in running economy among the 6 recreational runners tested. The development of a less physically demanding sustained exercise protocol is necessary to determine underlying neuromuscular mechanisms and/or clinical effectiveness of orthotic interventions.</description><dc:title>Effects of Foot Orthotics on Running Economy: Methodological Considerations</dc:title><dc:creator>Jeanmarie R. Burke, M. Owen Papuga</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>336</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000541/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Erratum</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000541/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>In the article “Thank You to JMPT Peer Reviewers for 2011” by Johnson C in the February 2012 issue (2012;35(2):74-5; doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.003), the following name was accidentally omitted and should be included on the list of 2011 peer reviewers: James Brantingham, DC, PhD.</description><dc:title>Erratum</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.03.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Erratum</prism:section><prism:startingPage>336</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>336</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000826/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Table of Contents</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475412000826/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Table of Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0161-4754(12)00082-6</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200084X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Information for Readers</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS016147541200084X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Information for Readers</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0161-4754(12)00084-X</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 35, 4 (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>35</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0161-4754(11)X0013-1</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>
