Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 234-246, February 2012

Correlation Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Obliquity and Tibial Rotation During Dynamic Pivoting Activities in Patients With Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vivo Examination

  • Franceska Zampeli, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • ,
  • Aikaterini Ntoulia, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • ,
  • Dimitrios Giotis, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • ,
  • Vasileios A. Tsiaras, P.E., M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • ,
  • Maria Argyropoulou, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  • ,
  • Evangelos Pappas, P.T., Ph.D., O.C.S.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Physical Therapy, Long Island University–Brooklyn Campus, Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A
  • ,
  • Anastasios D. Georgoulis, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Anastasios D. Georgoulis, M.D., PO Box 1042, Ioannina 45110, Greece

Received 19 February 2011; accepted 1 August 2011. published online 14 November 2011.

Purpose

To investigate the effect of coronal- and sagittal-plane anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft obliquity on tibial rotation (TR) range of motion (ROM) during dynamic pivoting activities after ACL reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft.

Methods

We evaluated 19 ACL-reconstructed patients (mean age, 29 years; age range, 18 to 38 years; mean time interval postoperatively, 19.9 months) and 19 matched control subjects (mean age, 30.6 years; age range, 24 to 37 years) using motion analysis during (1) descending a stairway and pivoting and (2) landing from a jump and pivoting. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the coronal and sagittal ACL graft angle. The dependent variables were TR ROM during pivoting and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in TR ROM between the reconstructed knee and the contralateral intact knee.

Results

TR ROM of the ACL-reconstructed knee was significantly increased compared with both the contralateral intact knee and the healthy control knee (P < .05). A significant positive correlation was observed between TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.727, P = .0006 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.795, P = .0001 for landing and pivoting) as well as between SSD of TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.789, P < .0001 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.799, P < .0001 for landing and pivoting). No correlation was found with the sagittal ACL graft angle.

Conclusions

After ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft, patients' knees showed higher TR values than their uninjured knees and the knees of uninjured control volunteers during dynamic pivoting activities. The findings of this study show that TR was better restored in ACL-reconstructed patients with a more oblique graft in the coronal plane. A similar relation was not observed for graft orientation in the sagittal plane. Although these data do not imply a cause-and-effect relation between the 2 variables, they may indicate that a more oblique placement of a single BPTB ACL graft in the coronal plane is correlated with better control of TR.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (HAOST-EEXOT).

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

 

Note: To access the videos accompanying this report, visit the February issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(11)01029-2

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.285

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 234-246, February 2012