Biological Psychiatry
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 605-613, 15 October 2005

Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • F. Andrew Kozel

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Imaging Research (CAIR), Medical University of South Carolina
    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
    • Ralph H. Johnson VA Hospital, Charleston, South Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to F. Andrew Kozel, M.D., M.S.C.R., UTSW Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., MC: 9119, Dallas, TX 75390-9119
  • ,
  • Kevin A. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Imaging Research (CAIR), Medical University of South Carolina
    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
  • ,
  • Qiwen Mu

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Imaging Research (CAIR), Medical University of South Carolina
    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
  • ,
  • Emily L. Grenesko

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Imaging Research (CAIR), Medical University of South Carolina
    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
  • ,
  • Steven J. Laken

      Affiliations

    • Cephos Corporation, Pepperell, Massachusetts.
  • ,
  • Mark S. George

      Affiliations

    • Center for Advanced Imaging Research (CAIR), Medical University of South Carolina
    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina

Received 29 April 2005; received in revised form 18 July 2005; accepted 27 July 2005. published online 27 September 2005.

Background

The ability to accurately detect deception is presently very limited. Detecting deception might be more accurately achieved by measuring the brain correlates of lying in an individual. In addition, a method to investigate the neurocircuitry of deception might provide a unique opportunity to test the neurocircuitry of persons in whom deception is a prominent component (i.e., conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, etc.).

Methods

In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to show that specific regions were reproducibly activated when subjects deceived. Subjects participated in a mock crime stealing either a ring or a watch. While undergoing an fMRI, the subjects denied taking either object, thus telling the truth with some responses, and lying with others. A Model-Building Group (MBG, n = 30) was used to develop the analysis methods, and the methods were subsequently applied to an independent Model-Testing Group (MTG, n = 31).

Results

We were able to correctly differentiate truthful from deceptive responses, correctly identifying the object stolen, for 93% of the subjects in the MBG and 90% of the subjects in the MTG.

Conclusions

This is the first study to use fMRI to detect deception at the individual level. Further work is required to determine how well this technology will work in different settings and populations.

Key Words:  Deception , lie , detection , fMRI , BOLD , individual

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0006-3223(05)00971-6

doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.040

Biological Psychiatry
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 605-613, 15 October 2005